AMD Neo vs IBM Xenon

AMD Neo
IBM Xenon
8 Cores
8 Threads
2.13GHz Clock
3 Cores
6 Threads
3.2GHz Clock
Socket
Unknown
Socket
Unknown
iGPU
Neo
4.2 TFLOPS FP32
iGPU
No GPU
- -
  • 26% lower vs Xenon
  • 35% higher vs Neo
Neo - 150W
x1
Xenon - 203W
x1.35
Manufacturer
AMD
Manufacturer
IBM
Architecture
Jaguar
Architecture
Cell PPE
Family
-
Family
-
Instruction Set (ISA)
x86-64
Instruction Set (ISA)
PowerPC
Codename
Neo
-
Codename
Xenon
Waternoose
Market Segment
Console
Market Segment
Console
Release Date
11/10/2016
Release Date
11/22/2005
Foundry
TSMC
Foundry
IBM
Node
16FF
Node
90nm
Die Size
322 mm²
Die Size
176 mm²
Transistor Count
5.7 Billion
Transistor Count
165 Million
Unknown
Unknown
8 Cores
3 Cores
8 Threads
6 Threads
2.13GHz
3.2GHz
Overclocking
Locked
Overclocking
Locked
Type
FSB
Type
FSB
Clock
1300MHz
Clock
1350MHz
Data Rate
Double
Data Rate
Single
Transfer Rate
2.6GT/s
Transfer Rate
1.4GT/s
Width
128Bit
Width
64Bit
Bandwidth
41.6GB/s
Bandwidth
10.8GB/s
Bi-directional
83.2GB/s
Bi-directional
21.6GB/s
L1 Instruction
32KB/Core
4-way set associative
L1 Instruction
32KB/Core
2-way set associative
L1 Data
32KB/Core
8-way set associative
L1 Data
32KB/Core
4-way set associative
L2
4MB Shared
16-way set associative
L2
1MB Shared
8-way set associative
No Memory Controller
No Memory Controller
TDP
150W
TDP
203W
No PCIe
No PCIe
Neo
2304 Shaders
911MHz
4.2 TFLOPS FP32
No GPU
-
-
- -
No NPU
No NPU
No Cellular
No Cellular
Change Comparison